# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 28.4.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 285 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.