# Codellama 34b Instruct vs ERNIE 5.1

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-ernie-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 28.4.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 285 | 87 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1481 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1481 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1491 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1455 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1486 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1471 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and ERNIE 5.1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.