# Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 87.9 to 30.2.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 61.9 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 10 | 274 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | 1035 |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1774 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165.03 | — |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1510 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1540 | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1289 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1452 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1522 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1451 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1495 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1498 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1474 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.