# Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 33.8.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 10 | 182 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1318 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1272 |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.