# Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.5

> Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 55.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-grok-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.5 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 60.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 31% for Grok 4.5.
- Grok 4.5 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 55.0 |
| Rank | 10 | 22 |
| Context | 1M | 500K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6)
- Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | 1552 |
| SciCode | 61% | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | 1,309 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 46.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14)
- Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29)
- Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | 15.4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1462 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.02 |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4)
- Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | 24.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 97.8% |
| ProofBench | 100% | 31% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1457 |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11)
- Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 93.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | 48.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5)
- Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | 22.5% |
| LMArena Vision | — | 1287 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1452 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1446 |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1457 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Grok 4.5?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 55.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 51.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.5 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.