# Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemma 3 4B

> Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 80× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-gemma-3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 15.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 27.9 |
| Rank | 10 | 320 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6)
- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1230 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14)
- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29)
- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1253 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| DTBench | — | 50.9% |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 116.02 |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4)
- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 7.5% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1239 |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11)
- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 23.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5)
- Gemma 3 4B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1273 |
| LMArena German | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1294 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1239 |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1274 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1270 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1255 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemma 3 4B?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 80× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 3 4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.