# Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemma 2B

> Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 27.6.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 10 | 305 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1010 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 989 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 971 |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 945 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemma 2B?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 2B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.