# Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 37.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 95.6% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 10 | 171 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | 65.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 5.5: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.