# Claude Sonnet 4 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-4-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 42.2 to 33.7.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 145 | 114 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $3 | — |
| Output $/M | $15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 4: 43.5 (#88)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1414 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 64.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.3% | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 46.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 655.35 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 4: 38.5 (#31)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 33.1% | — |
| Cybench | 35% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 46.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 43.9% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 62% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 4: 22.9 (#187)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 45.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 40% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.1% | — |
| DTBench | 77.1% | — |
| LMCA | 29% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.69 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 4: 43.3 (#80)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1375 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 60.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 84.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 4: 41.8 (#108)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 7.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 70.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 4: 26.2 (#121)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1191 | — |
| GeoBench | 37% | — |
| VPCT | 34% | — |
| MindCube | 44.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 4: 46.7 (#156)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1333 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1350 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1291 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1355 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1363 | — |
| LMArena German | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1357 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 4: 71.7 (#145)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 84% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 4: 33.7 (#259)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1398 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 4: 57.1 (#132)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1345 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1376 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1483 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4 has 58 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.