# Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

> Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-vs-gemini-2-0-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher in 9 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 46.1 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 89.9% for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 50.1 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 42 | 189 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $3 | — |
| Output $/M | $15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.0 (#62)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1322 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.2% | — |
| DeepSWE | 29.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 24.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1521 | — |
| SciCode | 46.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,327 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 39.1 (#26)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 53.4% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 43% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 9.3% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.9% | — |
| OSWorld | 72.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 23.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 48.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 18% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1221 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 7,204 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.1 (#40)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1324 |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 52.5% |
| ForecastBench | 62 | 57.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.5% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 13% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 76.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 50.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 16% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | 46.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.25 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.9 (#41)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1463 | 1309 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 85.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 45% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 32.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.6 (#60)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1500 | 1305 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 35.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 38.0 (#61)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | 1100 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 6.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1482 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 54.6 (#39)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1323 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1491 | 1339 |
| LMArena French | 1465 | 1346 |
| LMArena German | 1428 | 1306 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1419 | 1302 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1440 | 1328 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1465 | 1313 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 77.6 (#23)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1476 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 78.3% |
| IFEval | — | 82.4% |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 45.3 (#40)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1479 | 1321 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 4.6: 70.4 (#22)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1330 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1307 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1810 | — |
| WildBench | — | 79% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1207 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.0 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.