# Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3 Max

> Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.0 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 31

## Summary

- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 Max in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 Max leads 37.6 to 31.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 30.7% for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 48.7% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.0 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 76 | 82 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $3 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $15 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.8 (#54)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1489 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | 796.15 | 370.45 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 71.3% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 71.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1393 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67% | — |
| SciCode | 44.7% | — |
| GSO | 14.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.1 (#30)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,839 | 71.56 |
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 73.2% | — |
| GDPval | 42.5% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 72% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 72.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 84.9% | — |
| Cybench | 60% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1159 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 67.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#113)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 37.3% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | 5% |
| DTBench | 83.2% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 38.8% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.84 | 142.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 2.4% | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.9 | — |

## Math

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 31.9 (#190)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 23.9% | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1448 | 1447 |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.7% | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 19% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 55.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 15.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#70)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1483 | 1457 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 13.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 68.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.1 (#84)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 39.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1450 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.6 (#65)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1459 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 1427 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1390 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.2 (#74)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1459 | 1420 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#45)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1476 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.7 (#33)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1465 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1678 | — |
| WildBench | 85.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen3 Max?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.0 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.

### Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 Max share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.