# Claude Opus 5 vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-5-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5 leads 77.2 to 19.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 67.8 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 4 | 313 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1034 |
| DeepSWE | 73.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.4% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1691 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 52% | — |
| SciCode | 56.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 91.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,165 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 65.8% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 31.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 48.7% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 35% | — |
| BALROG | 63.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 79.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 24% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 11,182 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1005 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 29.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 42% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 45.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 59% | — |
| DTBench | 97.9% | — |
| LMCA | 64.5% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.12 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.78 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1531 | 1047 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 85.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 73.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1557 | 970 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 59.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 30.4% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1516 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1501 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1574 | 1012 |
| LMArena German | 1524 | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | 1521 | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 990 |
| LMArena French | 1519 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1516 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1519 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 992 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1515 | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1507 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1491 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1499 | 959 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2133 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1385 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.