# Claude Opus 5.5 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

> Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-ernie-5-0
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 9 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 80.2 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 88.5% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 68.6 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 3 | 129 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $4 | — |
| Output $/M | $20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1547 | 1455 |
| FrontierCode | 54.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1813 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | — |
| SciCode | 66.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,147 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 9,235 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 88.5% | 10.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1535 | 1445 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| EBR-Bench | 71.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 71% | — |
| DTBench | 98.9% | — |
| LMCA | 68.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 167.33 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1506 | 1437 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 95% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1547 | 1428 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | 1249 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 51.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 83.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1588 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1514 | 1467 |
| LMArena Russian | 1520 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1507 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1537 | 1413 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1532 | 1422 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3)
- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1515 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1533 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1499 | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2050 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 5.5 or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.