# Claude Opus 4.7 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 75.1 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 19 | 274 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1558 | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.25 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1480 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1531 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1503 | — |
| LMArena German | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1495 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.