# Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-muse-spark
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Spark in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.5 to 46.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 54% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 17% for Muse Spark.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 58.4 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 17 | 41 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.9 (#10)
- Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 54.5% | 51.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1482 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1557 | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#8)
- Muse Spark: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.7 (#24)
- Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 11.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1507 | 1475 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.39 | 152.09 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.5 (#20)
- Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | 54% | 17% |
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | 14.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#20)
- Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1458 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.5 (#29)
- Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1317 | 1306 |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | 1444 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.5 (#9)
- Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1481 | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1505 | 1497 |
| LMArena German | 1494 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1466 | 1457 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1467 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.6 (#9)
- Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1443 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.1 (#24)
- Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1451 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.3 (#8)
- Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1460 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1506 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 45.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Spark share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.