# Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.5 to 36.1.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 58.4 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 17 | 128 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.9 (#10)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1557 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1417 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#8)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.7 (#24)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1507 | 1395 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.39 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.5 (#20)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1419 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#20)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1388 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.5 (#29)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1317 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.5 (#9)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1481 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1505 | — |
| LMArena German | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.6 (#9)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.1 (#24)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.3 (#8)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1506 | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Muse Glimmer?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Glimmer share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.