# Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 7B

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 75.1 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 19 | 299 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1048 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1558 | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.25 | 111.99 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1066 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1001 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1480 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1531 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1503 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1495 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 963 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemma 7B?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemma 7B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.