# Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-gemini-1-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 27

## Summary

- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.5 to 24.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 75.8% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 0.8% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 58.4 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 17 | 253 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.9 (#10)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 76.4% | 22.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1294 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1557 | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.8% |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.5% |
| CadEval | — | 34% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | — | 74.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#8)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| BALROG | — | 21% |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.7 (#24)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1507 | 1296 |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 59% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.39 | 131.73 |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | 58.4 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.5 (#20)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | 23.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1315 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#20)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | 57.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | 4.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1279 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.4% |
| MMLU | — | 86.9% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.5 (#29)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1317 | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.5 (#9)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1481 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | 1505 | 1301 |
| LMArena German | 1494 | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | 1466 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1310 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.6 (#9)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1297 |
| IFEval | — | 83.7% |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.1 (#24)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.3 (#8)
- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1506 | 1296 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| WildBench | — | 81.3% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.