# Claude Opus 4.7 vs ERNIE 5.1

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-ernie-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 53.8 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 39% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 19 | 83 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1558 | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1233 | 1227 |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)
- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | 23.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1481 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.25 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)
- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1481 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)
- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1492 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)
- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1480 | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1531 | 1508 |
| LMArena French | 1503 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1495 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1495 | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)
- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)
- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1471 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than ERNIE 5.1?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and ERNIE 5.1 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.