# Claude Opus 4.7 vs DBRX

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-dbrx
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and DBRX in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 62.6 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.2% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 32.9% for DBRX.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 19 | 311 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)
- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1132 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1558 | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 70.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 55.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)
- DBRX: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)
- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1113 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.25 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)
- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1145 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)
- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | 32.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1076 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)
- DBRX: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)
- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1480 | 1071 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1531 | 1068 |
| LMArena French | 1503 | 1096 |
| LMArena German | 1495 | 1057 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | 990 |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | 993 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1078 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1495 | 1064 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)
- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1112 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)
- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1112 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)
- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1119 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1104 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1111 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than DBRX?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.7 or DBRX better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and DBRX share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and DBRX has 21.