# Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> Claude Opus 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.5 leads 56.4 to 15.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 86.1% for Claude Opus 4.5 and 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 50.5 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 39 | 327 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $5 | — |
| Output $/M | $25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.5: 55.4 (#21)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1108 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 76.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1493 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 70.7% | — |
| GSO | 26.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 63.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,025 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.77 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.5: 47.2 (#11)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 63.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 77.5% | — |
| GDPval | 45.5% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 3.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 84% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 24.7% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 79.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 92.3% | — |
| Cybench | 82% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.8% | — |
| OSWorld | 66.3% | — |
| BALROG | 43.5% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1180 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 75% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,967 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.5: 42.5 (#43)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1476 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.1 | 116.97 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 52.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 80% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 11.9% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMCA | 44.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.5: 38.5 (#85)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.1% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1463 | 1132 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 34.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 36% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 20.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.5: 56.4 (#38)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86% | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | 1059 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 25.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 45.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| MMLU | — | 70% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.5: 31.1 (#99)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GeoBench | 75% | — |
| VPCT | 40% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 28.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1462 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.5: 54.5 (#45)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1470 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1144 |
| LMArena German | 1449 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1415 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1448 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1455 | 1118 |
| LMArena Korean | 1424 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.5: 77.7 (#20)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1478 | 1114 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.5: 46.4 (#21)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1480 | 1132 |
| CL-bench | 21.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.5: 68.2 (#28)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1445 | 1130 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1466 | 1139 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1687 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.5 has 69 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.