# Claude Opus 4.1 vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-1-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Hy3 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 22.3.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.1.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 44.2 |
| Rank | 142 | 79 |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $15 | $0.13 |
| Output $/M | $75 | $0.53 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73)
- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | 1508 |
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1464 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76)
- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.12 | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277)
- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101)
- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 35% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95)
- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1493 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58)
- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1435 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74)
- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1436 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.1 lists at $15 and $75.

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 44.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Hy3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.