# Claude Opus 4.1 vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-1-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 4.7 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 41.1 to 22.0.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.1.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 136 | 56 |
| Context | 200K | 500K |
| Input $/M | $15 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $75 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.3 (#69)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | 1636 |
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1423 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.1: 34.8 (#38)
- Grok 4.7: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.1: 31.6 (#70)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1409 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.11 | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.1: 22.0 (#267)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1393 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.1: 41.9 (#93)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1413 |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.1: 26.2 (#114)
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 35% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.1: 52.1 (#90)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1421 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1432 | — |
| LMArena German | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.1: 75.8 (#53)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#60)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.1: 62.6 (#70)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1389 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.1 lists at $15 and $75.

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Grok 4.7 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.