# Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-1-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 44.5 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 77.3% for Claude Opus 4.1 and 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 136 | 171 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $15 | — |
| Output $/M | $75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.3 (#69)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | — |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.1: 34.8 (#38)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.1: 31.6 (#70)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | 0.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.11 | 135.06 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.1: 22.0 (#267)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1430 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.1: 41.9 (#93)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.1: 26.2 (#114)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 35% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.1: 52.1 (#90)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena French | 1432 | — |
| LMArena German | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.1: 75.8 (#53)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1436 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#60)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.1: 62.6 (#70)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.