# Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-1-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 42.0 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 68.9% for Claude Opus 4.1 and 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 27.3 |
| Rank | 142 | 332 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $15 | — |
| Output $/M | $75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1108 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | — |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 80% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.12 | 117.04 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |

## Math

- Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1132 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1059 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
| MMLU | — | 70% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VPCT | 35% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1435 | 1114 |

## Long Context

- Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1132 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1139 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.