# Claude Instant vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Llama 3.2 3B has enough public results to be ranked (#318); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-instant-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 28.4 |
| Rank | — | 318 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Claude Instant: 18.8
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1095 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.2 | — |

## Math

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | — |
| MMLU | 73.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Instant: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1094 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1105 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Instant better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 3B has enough public results to be ranked (#318); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Llama 3.2 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.