# Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 38.3.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.50 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 52 | 138 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |

## Math

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |

## Multimodal

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 lists at $0.10 and $0.50.

### Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.