# Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 7B

> Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 31.2.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 52 | 299 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1042 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21)
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1035 |
| LMArena French | — | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 993 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Haiku 5.5: —
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemma 7B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.