# Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Haiku 4.5 leads 58.1 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 155 | 272 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $1 | — |
| Output $/M | $5 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.9 (#71)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | — |
| SciCode | 43.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 653.48 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 33.5 (#50)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 68.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | — |
| BALROG | 31.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 458.89 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 15.1 (#310)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 47.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| DTBench | 73.6% | — |
| LMCA | 30.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.42 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |

## Math

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.0 (#69)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1395 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 37.6 (#146)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 27.0 (#111)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 50.1 (#124)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1376 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1408 | — |
| LMArena German | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 71.6 (#144)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1049 |
| IFEval | 80.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 43.6 (#86)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Haiku 4.5: 58.1 (#119)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1371 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1047 |
| WildBench | 83.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1064 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 4.5 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.