# Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)

> Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-gemini-2-0-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 10 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 76.8 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 89.2% for Claude Fable 5 and 1.3% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).

## Snapshot

| | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 66.3 | 34.8 |
| Rank | 5 | 223 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $10 | — |
| Output $/M | $50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude Fable 5: 67.0 (#4)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 91.9% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1351 |
| DeepSWE | 69.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1626 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 47% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| ALE-Bench | 2,041 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Fable 5: 54.1 (#2)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 39.7% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | — |
| GBAEval | 74.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1230 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,680 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#4)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 39.3% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 98.4% | 63.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.6 | 135.36 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 28.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 41% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 39.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 52% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| LMCA | 61.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.13 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |

## Math

- Claude Fable 5: 88.4 (#5)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1351 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 95% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 82.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Fable 5: 62.3 (#22)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | 64.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1534 | 1340 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.7% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Fable 5: 45.6 (#14)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1326 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 35.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Fable 5: 57.6 (#8)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1483 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1546 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1509 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1486 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1507 | 1293 |
| LMArena Korean | 1493 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | 1363 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Fable 5: 78.8 (#7)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1503 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |

## Long Context

- Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#22)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1510 | 1345 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Fable 5: 76.1 (#5)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1494 | 1340 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1943 | 1128 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1340 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.0 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 61 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.