# Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

> Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 44.9 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs 69× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Fable 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-deepseek-v3-2-exp
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 34

## Summary

- They share 34 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 8 categories and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 76.8 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 95% for Claude Fable 5 and 8% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is cheaper at $0.26 / $0.38 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.
- Claude Fable 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 164K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 66.3 | 44.9 |
| Rank | 5 | 68 |
| Context | 1M | 164K |
| Input $/M | $10 | $0.26 |
| Output $/M | $50 | $0.38 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Fable 5: 67.0 (#4)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.4 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1626 | 1362 |
| SciCode | 61% | 38.9% |
| WeirdML | 91.9% | 39.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1519 | 1454 |
| DeepSWE | 69.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 53.5% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 70% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 74.2% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 59% |
| FrontierSWE | 47% | — |
| MirrorCode | 63.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,041 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Fable 5: 54.1 (#2)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 37.9 (#31)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,680 | 1,034 |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 39.6% |
| APEX-Agents | 63.6% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 56.7% |
| Remote Labor Index | 16.1% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 42.9% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 39.7% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 41.8% | — |
| GBAEval | 74.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1230 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#4)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.0 (#185)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.2% | 4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | 52.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.7% | 36.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | 57% |
| CritPt | 28.6% | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 41% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1508 | 1433 |
| DTBench | 98.4% | 87.7% |
| LMCA | 61.1% | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 163.6 | 146.28 |
| SimpleBench | 81.9% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 39.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 65% |
| EBR-Bench | 39.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 52% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 95% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.13 | — |

## Math

- Claude Fable 5: 88.4 (#5)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 40.8 (#75)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 87.8% |
| ProofBench | 95% | 8% |
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1435 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90.2% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 57.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 22.1% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Claude Fable 5: 62.3 (#22)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | 83.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1534 | 1436 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.3% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Fable 5: 45.6 (#14)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1326 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 38.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 35.8% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1496 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Fable 5: 57.6 (#8)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.4 (#85)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1483 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1546 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | 1509 | 1435 |
| LMArena German | 1486 | 1440 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1507 | 1377 |
| LMArena Korean | 1493 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | 1441 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Fable 5: 78.8 (#7)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.7 (#89)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1503 | 1413 |

## Long Context

- Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#22)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#15)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1510 | 1428 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| CL-bench | — | 13.2% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 9.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Fable 5: 76.1 (#5)
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.5 (#73)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1425 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1494 | 1403 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1943 | 1515 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1340 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Fable 5 better than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 44.9 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs 69× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Fable 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is cheaper. It lists at $0.26 per million input tokens and $0.38 per million output tokens; Claude Fable 5 lists at $10 and $50.

### Is Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better for coding?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.0 versus 46.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5 does, with 1M tokens against 164K.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp share?

34 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 61 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 48.