# Claude Fable 5.1 vs Wizardlm 70b

> Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.5 to 29.7.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 68.5 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 2 | 245 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $10 | — |
| Output $/M | $50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Fable 5.1: 70.5 (#2)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1523 | 1081 |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1753 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Fable 5.1: 50.8 (#5)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#5)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1079 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| DTBench | 97.6% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165 | — |

## Math

- Claude Fable 5.1: 89.5 (#3)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1116 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Fable 5.1: 69.3 (#5)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1528 | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Fable 5.1: 54.1 (#4)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Fable 5.1: 59.5 (#2)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1509 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1589 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1495 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1525 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1565 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#6)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1515 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Claude Fable 5.1: 46.8 (#19)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1524 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#1)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1511 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.5 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 50 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.