# Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax M1

> Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Fable 5.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.6 to 37.5.
- MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 69.0 | 40.3 |
| Rank | 2 | 150 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $10 | $0.55 |
| Output $/M | $50 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1)
- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1528 | 1359 |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1744 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| GSO | 88.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7)
- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1339 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| DTBench | 97.6% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 164.7 | — |

## Math

- Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4)
- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1525 | 1361 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6)
- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1535 | 1317 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4)
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1318 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3)
- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1586 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1525 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1500 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1543 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1534 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1521 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1516 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6)
- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1522 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2)
- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1510 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | 1335 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than MiniMax M1?

Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Fable 5.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Claude Fable 5.1 lists at $10 and $50.

### Is Claude Fable 5.1 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 74.7 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.