# Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma 7B

> Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.5 to 28.7.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 68.5 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 2 | 295 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $10 | — |
| Output $/M | $50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude Fable 5.1: 70.5 (#2)
- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1523 | 1048 |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1753 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude Fable 5.1: 50.8 (#5)
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#5)
- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 165 | 111.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| DTBench | 97.6% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Claude Fable 5.1: 89.5 (#3)
- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1519 | 1066 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Claude Fable 5.1: 69.3 (#5)
- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1528 | 1002 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multimodal

- Claude Fable 5.1: 54.1 (#4)
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude Fable 5.1: 59.5 (#2)
- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1509 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1589 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1532 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 1525 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1565 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1503 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#6)
- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1515 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Claude Fable 5.1: 46.8 (#19)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1524 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#1)
- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1511 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | 963 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Gemma 7B?

Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.5 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemma 7B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 50 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.