# Claude 3 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-sonnet-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 38.7 to 29.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 18.2% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 56.1% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 319 | 297 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | 52.3% |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.7 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | — |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1213 | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1189 | — |
| LMArena French | 1229 | — |
| LMArena German | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.