# Claude 3 Sonnet vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-sonnet-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 37.4 to 10.0.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 311 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1516 |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | 1481 |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.69 | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1213 | 1477 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | 1516 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1188 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1424 |
| LMArena French | 1228 | — |
| LMArena German | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1200 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.