# Claude 3 Sonnet vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-sonnet-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 10.7.
- Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 319 | 89 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1484 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | 1443 |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.7 | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1213 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1189 | 1449 |
| LMArena French | 1229 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1204 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1427 |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.