# Claude 3 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-sonnet-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 10.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 18.2% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 311 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| WeirdML | 10.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 64% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.69 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1197 | — |
| DTBench | 53.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
| WinoGrande | 75.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 18.2% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1213 | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1173 | — |
| MMLU | 75.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 984 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1188 | — |
| LMArena French | 1228 | — |
| LMArena German | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1204 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1200 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1211 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.