# Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 Max leads 38.7 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 73.3% for Qwen3 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 43.7 |
| Rank | 310 | 87 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267)
- Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1456 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 17% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 142.38 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299)
- Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1446 |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1455 |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1462 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228)
- Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1419 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3 Max share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.