# Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 13.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 300 | 66 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 84% |
| LMCA | 17% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 147.39 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1274 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1439 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1459 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.