# Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 1B

> Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-gemma-3-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3 1B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3 Opus leads 24.5 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 47.2% for Claude 3 Opus and 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 21.1 |
| Rank | 310 | 353 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116)
- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324)
- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299)
- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267)
- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 19.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | — |
| LMArena French | 1275 | — |
| LMArena German | 1258 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemma 3 1B?

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3 1B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.