# Claude 3 Opus vs Claude Opus 4.7

> Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-claude-opus-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.7 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.5 to 13.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 97.8% for Claude Opus 4.7.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 58.4 |
| Rank | 300 | 17 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $5 |
| Output $/M | — | $25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 59.9 (#10)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | 76.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1519 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 83.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1557 |
| SciCode | — | 54.5% |
| GSO | — | 44.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| MirrorCode | — | 31.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,323 |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#8)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80.2% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 49.2% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 18.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.2% |
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| PostTrainBench | — | 28.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 26.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 43.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 21% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1233 |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,937 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 53.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | 61.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 30% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1507 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 94.7% |
| LMCA | 17% | 52.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 156.39 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 60.3 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 75.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 80.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 93.5% |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 72.8% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 19% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 28% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 66.5 (#20)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 97.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 70.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 73.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 54% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 43.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 22.9% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#20)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 90.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | 51.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1521 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 36.2% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12% |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 41.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | 1317 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 24.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 33.3% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1495 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 57.5 (#9)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1481 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1530 |
| LMArena French | 1274 | 1505 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1494 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1472 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1466 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1494 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1497 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 78.6 (#9)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1498 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 46.1 (#24)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1505 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208)
- Claude Opus 4.7: 75.3 (#8)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1486 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1506 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1914 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1311 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Opus better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Opus or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Claude Opus 4.7 share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.7 has 66.