# Claude 3 Opus vs Claude Fable 5.1

> Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-claude-fable-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Fable 5.1 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.6 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 100% for Claude Fable 5.1.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 69.0 |
| Rank | 310 | 2 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $10 |
| Output $/M | — | $50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | 92.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1528 |
| FrontierCode | — | 50.9% |
| CursorBench | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1744 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 56.3% |
| SciCode | — | 63.1% |
| GSO | — | 88.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| MirrorCode | — | 73.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 2,143 |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 68.6% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 17.9% |
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 29.6% |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,422 |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 47% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1526 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 97.6% |
| LMCA | 17% | 65.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 164.7 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 90% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 90% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 97.5% |
| CritPt | — | 31.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 57.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 58% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 100% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1525 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 90.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 87.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 100% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | 70.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1535 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 46.5% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | 1318 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 41.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 70% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1513 |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1507 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1586 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1525 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1500 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1543 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1521 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1516 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1517 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1522 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213)
- Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1510 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1507 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1492 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2162 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Opus better than Claude Fable 5.1?

Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Opus or Claude Fable 5.1 better for coding?

Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 74.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Claude Fable 5.1 share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Claude Fable 5.1 has 52.