# Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen-14B

> Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-haiku-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen-14B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 9.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 340 | 275 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1071 |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | 113.03 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.8% | 66.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1022 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen-14B?

Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen-14B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.