# Claude 3 Haiku vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-haiku-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 33.8 to 9.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 333 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Haiku: 26.1 (#320)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1318 |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Haiku: 15.7 (#303)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.3 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Haiku: 9.2 (#313)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#280)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Haiku: 23.1 (#123)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#238)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1194 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1108 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1165 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Haiku: 61.5 (#242)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#232)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Haiku: 29.8 (#286)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1289 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Haiku or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.