# Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-haiku-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 29.7.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 340 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1420 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | — |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1174 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.