# Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-haiku-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 9.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 340 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1199 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| WeirdML | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.1% | — |
| CadEval | 12% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
| HumanEval+ | 68.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 68.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3 Haiku: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1174 | 1512 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 34.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| DTBench | 50.1% | — |
| LMCA | 8.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.35 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.2 | — |
| WinoGrande | 74.2% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1148 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 34.2% | — |
| MMLU | 73.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 950 | 1264 |
| ScienceQA | 72% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1178 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1155 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1204 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1195 | — |
| LMArena German | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1102 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1109 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1166 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1173 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1190 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Claude 3 Haiku | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1195 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1157 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1464 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 717 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.