# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 18.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 164 | 182 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 143.26 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 83.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.