# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen Max

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 35.7 to 21.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 64.9% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 21.8% for Qwen Max.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 154 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 41.1 (#120)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1288 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.9 (#46)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.7 (#252)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1270 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 35.7 (#137)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1336 | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | 1% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.7 (#117)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1248 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.1 (#90)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.3 (#174)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1268 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1299 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 73.1 (#120)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1262 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.2 (#10)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1289 |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.6 (#145)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1277 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen Max?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen Max better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen Max share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.