# Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 39.9.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 164 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1347 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1322 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |

## Math

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1309 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.